Moldes para fundição sob baixa pressão (LPDC)
Moldes para fundição por gravidade
Moldes de fundição por contrapressão (CPC)
Molde para fundição de peças estruturais
Molde de fundição para cubo de roda de motocicleta
Molde de fundição por pressão diferencial para cub
Molde para fundição por gravidade de cubos de roda
Baixa pressão no cubo da roda
Front subframe mold with optimized draw bead shape and layout controls maximum sheet thinning rate below 20% and prevents cracking at high strain regions of subframe components.
Draw beads restrain material flow speed in deep drawing process. The bead height, radius, gap and layout position are optimized by CAE iteration. Proper draw bead resistance slows down material inflow and avoids excessive thinning at part corner and transition areas.
Chassis stamping data shows unreasonable draw bead parameters are responsible for 47% of part cracking issues during subframe mold tryout. Too strong draw bead resistance will crack the sheet, while insufficient restraint leads to wrinkling.
Local front subframe mold suppliers can modify draw bead profile during mold tryout, and provide 24-hour remote technical support for bead grinding and resistance adjustment.
The difference between circular draw bead and rectangular draw bead is clear. Round bead brings gentle material bending and lower risk of cracking; rectangular bead provides larger flow resistance for material with good ductility.
A common tryout pitfall is simply polishing draw bead to reduce resistance blindly. Excessive polishing reduces bead restraining force and induces wrinkling on flange surface.
Draw bead iterative optimization during mold development increases front subframe mold cost by 7%–15%. The cost comes from repeated CNC machining, manual bead polishing and CAE simulation iterations.
Common draw bead related defects include bead scratch marks on workpiece, local sheet cracking and flange wrinkling. Surface inspection of draw bead should be carried out every 9,000 stamping cycles.
When comparing front subframe mold manufacturers, check draw bead simulation cloud diagram and thinning analysis result. Experienced teams adjust bead resistance step by step during tryout.
Draw bead optimization and sheet thinning control technology for front subframe molds is widely used for deep drawing forming of complex new energy vehicle chassis subframe.
FAQ
Q1: What is the target control value of sheet thinning rate for automotive subframe stamping?
A: The maximum sheet thinning rate is generally controlled below 20% for critical structural zones.
Q2: What function does draw bead play in deep drawing mold?
A: Restrain material flow velocity, balance material inflow and suppress wrinkling and cracking.
Q3: How much extra cost for draw bead iterative optimization?
A: Draw bead optimization adds approximately 7% to 15% of total mold cost.
Q4: Which front subframe mold factory optimizes draw bead by CAE simulation?
A: Source mold factories with stamping forming simulation and deep drawing tryout capability.
Q5: What problem if draw bead resistance is too large?
A: Excessive material stretching, serious thinning and cracking at workpiece corner areas.
Q6: Can draw bead be manually polished on site?
A: Minor polishing adjustment is allowed during tryout; large profile modification needs CNC rework.
Moldes para fundição por baixa pressão (LPDC)
Moldes para fundição por gravidade
Moldes para fundição por contrapressão (CPC)
Moldes para fundição de peças estruturais
Molde para fundição de cubos de roda de motocicleta
Molde para fundição por pressão diferencial de cubos de roda
Molde para fundição por gravidade de cubos de roda
Molde para fundição por baixa pressão de cubos de roda
MOLDES PARA JANTES AUTOMÓVEIS
PEÇAS ESTRUTURAIS AUTOMÓVEIS
OUTROS COMPONENTES DE FUNDIDOS DE ALUMÍNIO
PERFIL DA EMPRESA
ESTRUTURA ORGANIZACIONAL
HISTÓRICO DE DESENVOLVIMENTO
PROPRIEDADE INTELECTUAL
ESPÍRITO DE EQUIPA PARCEIRO
Copyright © Zhejiang Xinfeng Machinery Co., Ltd. All Rights Reserved.